翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ De La Salle University College of Computer Studies ・ De La Salle University College of Law ・ De La Salle University College of Liberal Arts ・ De La Salle University College of Science ・ De La Salle University School of Economics ・ De La Salle University Science and Technology Complex ・ De La Salle University – Dasmariñas ・ De La Salle Zobel Chorale ・ De La Salle Zobel Symphony Orchestra ・ De La Salle–College of Saint Benilde ・ De La Savane (Montreal Metro) ・ De La Soul ・ De La Soul discography ・ De La Soul Is Dead ・ De La Soulviet ・ De Kock v Davidson and Others ・ De Koel ・ De Kok ・ De komst van Joachim Stiller ・ De komst van Joachim Stiller (film) ・ De Koninck ・ De Koninck Brewery ・ De Koningshoeven Brewery ・ De Koninklijke Porceleyne Fles ・ De Koog ・ De Kooy (hamlet) ・ De Kooy Airfield ・ De koperen hond ・ De Korenaar, Sexbierum ・ De Korenbloem Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク De Kock v Davidson and Others ： ウィキペディア英語版 De Kock v Davidson and Others ''De Kock v Davidson and Others''〔1971 (1) SA 428 (T).〕 is an important case in South African civil procedure. It was an application for a rule ''nisi'', heard in the Transvaal Provincial Division by Colman J on November 3 and 4, 1970; judgment was delivered on November 11. The applicant's attorneys were Michael Kerbel, Johannesburg, and Getz, Behr, Ogus & Mendel Cohen, Pretoria. The respondent's attorneys were Divin, Davis & Miller, Johannesburg, and Carson, Haswell & Co., Pretoria. The applicant was represented in court by J. Unterhalter, SC (with him MM Joffe); SA Rosenzweig appeared for the respondents. The application involved the issue of costs. The applicant had applied for order with which the respondents would anyway have complied. The matter was not one of urgency, and no prior demand had been made of the respondent. The applicant, accordingly, was ordered to pay costs of application. == Facts == The applicant had applied for an order calling upon the first and second respondents to transfer to him certain shares in the third respondent, a company in which they held the shares, and to appoint him a director. The respondents, in a replying affidavit, conceded that the applicant was entitled to the orders prayed for. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「De Kock v Davidson and Others」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.